I can tell you first hand that we were at a NAFA tournament recently and while there were a total of 30 teams racing… only 7 dogs TOTAL were measured! Why??? Because the NAFA measuring system is not very accurate. Once a team gets a low measurement on a dog… they just never measure that dog again and jump that height. The vast majority of these dogs also do NOT have height cards. *Trust me… I checked.

It then is up to the opposing team to ‘call’ that team on its height dog. I’ve played NAFA flyball for 3 years now and I have yet to EVER see a team call another one on their height dog. Why???? Because most of us are ‘friends’ and that wouldn’t be the neighborly thing to do. Yet when you truly look at it… isn’t it cheating? And is it very neighborly for the opposing team to cheat its way to victory? Not if you ask me.

For me personally… I’d love to see NAFA implement the U-Fli method of measuring. The current method is just too subjective. If a dog is spooked by a particulr judge (say a male judge or a louder voiced judge, etc.) and stands on its ‘toes’ during measuring… the height could easily be 2 to 3 inches HIGHER than a tournament 2 weeks prior where the dog was relaxed during measuring. Is this truly fair to the dog, the team, the other dogs on the team that have been practicing week in and week out at the jump height their height dog has been measuring right along? Not if you ask me. Asking ANY dog to jump 10″ instead of 8″ after they’ve spent countless hours practicing at 8″ is a recipe for disaster and injury to any dog on that team.

The NAFA method is simply too inaccurate in my personal opinion.

I tried to look at this as objectively as I could and I’m not going to get into the habit of defending my post but in this case I thought that I should. I have attended both NAFA and U-FLI tournaments. My dogs have been measured for both NAFA and U-FLI tournaments. To me it doesn’t take a genius to figure out which is a more accurate method of measurement.

Larry

I have one question that I would really like to have an “objective” answer for. If it is true that this method is so “objective” and “accurate”, Why? is it that a friend of mine was encouraged by a U-FLI shareholder to have her dog measured at each and every U-FLI tournament she participates in until she could get the one lowest possible measurement that she wants? In other words, she could measure 5, 10 or even 100 times and if only one judge measures her dog so that it jumps lower than it ever has before, THAT ONE MEASURE now becomes that dog’s jump height forever. If that can happen, just how “accurate” can you claim the U-FLI method to be?
….and, the second thing I’m curious about is this: If the judge that measures a dog in U-FLI and finds that dog should be jumping shorter than it did previously by other judges, if that judge is not applying that method correctly according to U-FLI’s rules, what recourse do U-FLI competitors have to make that judge follow U-FLI’s rules? Can U-FLI revoke that dog’s “inaccurate” measure?